h1

Filtering – How much, and what?

September 23, 2007

I finally got around to posting a comment to a post by Adrian Greig on the Expanding Learning Horizons and SchoolTech 2007 group on facebook and thought I’d share my thoughts here as well. I’m not sure of the general availability of this post so I’ll repeat some of it here.

Adrian asked the following:

Web filtering on the internet…there are risks but great benefits?
What is the best solution/answer. Completely open? Filter heavily? Or some balance?
Who should choose?
How to decide what gets filtered?
My state system has major filtering in place much to the great ire of many teachers as they want to use Youtube, etc.
How much do you filter?
How do you deal with problems?

This is an issue that I have been thinking a lot about lately. I am being made increasingly aware of the frustration caused to teachers when the lesson they have planned won’t work because of blocked sites.

My response to Adrian was:

I work for a Multi-Campus Independent K-12 College on the NSW Hunter Coast as the Sys Admin for one of those campuses. We have implemented a central filtering appliance at our ISP so that all of our Campuses (5) go through the same filter. Any requests to have a site unblocked have to go through our Main Campus.

I have seen first hand the struggle our teachers have with this, and I too have my hands tied as I can’t assist them.

Since ELH, Lisa-Gaye and I have discussed filtering and if it is too heavy. As stated earlier we have a “duty of care” to our students, but does that mean “filter anything and everything that may pose a real or implied threat” or does it mean “filter as much of the nasty’s that you can, but leave the middle grey areas open and teach about the dangers”? I have seen our senior students give up on using the Internet for research as, in their words, “we cant get to anything so why bother trying”

It’s interesting that when searching I have found documents put out by the Education Departments in Vic, Tas, and SA all to do with the “duty of care” as it applies to the Internet, but nothing from NSW where we are based.

I’d like to do some research… pick a couple of classes (get parental permission), reduce the filtering, monitor their use (for pastoral care follow up as required), and see how their work standard, and attitude improve. Could be interesting I think.

What do you think about the whole filtering issue? I’d like some feedback on this to take to our ICT Committee when we try and push for change.

6 comments

  1. You have it exactly right ….. we have gone overboard with this duty of care stuff, and it is restrictive and draconian. Schools are about educating and helping children make appropriate decisions. Trouble is we make all the important decisions for them. What kind of education is that? There are increasing calls for student voices to be heard and I suggest a way forward is to have a student representative on your committee and give them a vote. Listen to what they have to say and ask for their advice. Let them help with the monitoring. See what happens …. I will look for research but I don’t hold much store in it. Sounds like a great action research project for you-know-who…


  2. The biggest problem will be enabling change. The legalese that has been applied to the duty of care issue is just ridiculous. Who will be game to allow change?

    The idea of Student representation is a good one. I’ll run this past LG and see what she thinks.

    We have a Commerce/Legal Studies Teacher that is finding it really difficult to teach as just about anything that she tries to get to is blocked. We have requested that she submit this issue officially to the Committee, which is sad that it has to be done that way, and we’ll wait and see where we can push that. If we combine that with submissions from Students who have had difficulty in studying and research may help as well. We’ll make sure they’re Yr12’s trying to prepare for their HSC of course.

    It’s a shame that we have to justify it to this degree.


  3. I like the idea of having the students involved, but I see it working better at a different level.
    I would prefer it TFT if you and I were to co-chair a student sub-committee. This would give the students their own forum to begin with & as time goes on or when they have an item they want to get teacher opinion on then they come to the ICT Committee with it. At present I think they need a voice & to not be overwhelmed by the larger committee.
    Now…how about inviting the P&F to nominate one of their number to join the ICT Committee?


  4. I’m going to scribble some ideas over the next 2 weeks (yeah Holidays!!) If we are going to invite PTF representation we may need to show our reasoning to get their support.

    Now, how do I mindmap again?


  5. http://www.weblogg-ed.com/

    TFT this is the blog I mentioned to you yesterday. Have a look at the entry entitled “Supplementing my kids’ education”


  6. It’s certainly a hot topic. I find it usually comes down to bad communication and a lack of knowledge about and even trust in our learners.

    There are some comments here from my posting asking similar questions (but not as good) – http://www.flairandsquare.com/archives/121

    Hope they help.
    Regards,
    Alex



Leave a Comment